Back to top
 
INDICATOR NAME
Name
Percentage of long-term care home residents who fell in the last 30 days
Alternate Name
Percentage of long-term care home residents who fell
 
INDICATOR DESCRIPTION
Description
This indicator measures the percentage of long-term care home residents who fell during the 30 days preceding their resident assessment. Falls are the leading cause of injury for seniors and contribute to a significant burden on the health care system. Residents are at a higher risk of falling if they have a history of falls or are taking certain medications. Preventing falls increases the safety and quality of care of residents. The indicator is calculated as a rolling four quarter average. This indicator was jointly developed by interRAI and the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). A lower percentage is better.
Indicator Status
Active
HQO Reporting tool/product
Public reporting
Dimension
Safe
Type
Outcome
 
DEFINITION AND SOURCE INFORMATION
Unit of Measurement
Percentage
Calculation Methods
The indicator is calculated using four rolling quarters of data by summing the number of residents that meet the inclusion criteria for the target quarter and each of the previous three fiscal quarters. This is done for both the numerator and denominator. The unadjusted value is the quotient of the summed numerator divided by the summed denominator, multiplied by 100 to get the percentage.
Numerator including inclusion/exclusion

Number of long-term care home residents in the denominator who had a fall in the last 30 days recorded on their Resident Assessment Instrument - Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS) 2.0 target assessment

Inclusions:

J4a = 1

Where,

J4A = Fell in the past 30 days [0,1]

0 = No

1 = Yes

Denominator including inclusion/exclusion

Number of long-term care home residents in a fiscal quarter with a valid RAI-MDS 2.0 assessment

Inclusions:

To be considered valid, the resident assessment must: 

  • Be the latest assessment in the quarter
  • Be carried out more than 92 days after the admission date 
  • Not be a RAI-MDS 2.0 Admission Full Assessment
Adjustment (risk, age/sex standardization)- detailed

This indicator can be risk adjusted at the individual covariate level and through direct standardization.

Individual covariates:

  • Not totally dependent in transferring 
  • Locomotion problem 
  • Personal Severity Index (PSI)*: Subset 2: Non-Diagnoses 
  • Any wandering 
  • Unsteady gait/cognitive impairment 
  • Age younger than 65 

Direct standardization: 

  • Case Mix Index (CMI)** 

*PSI is statistically linked to the likelihood of death within six months 
**The relative resource use compared to the overall average resource use for all Ontario long-term care home residents

Data Source
Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS)
Data provided to HQO by
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)
Reported Levels of comparability /stratifications (defined)
Institution, Province, Region, Time
 
RESULT UPDATES
Indicator Results
 
OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION
Caveats and Limitations
This indicator captures whether the resident fell in the last 30 days but does not capture whether the fall resulted in injury. Residents have a right to balance the risk of falls with their right to remain mobile and unrestrained; therefore, a certain number of falls are inevitable. The focus should be on reducing the number of falls, recognizing that some falls will occur, and preventing injuries associated with falls. The results for this indicator include only residents in long-stay beds. Rolling four quarter averages stabilize the rates from quarter-to-quarter variations, especially for smaller facilities, but make it more difficult to detect quarterly changes. Since residents are assessed on a quarterly basis, each resident can contribute to the indicator up to four times. Risk-adjusted values are censored if the denominator is less than 30. General limitations when using RAI-MDS 2.0 data include random error, coding errors and missing values. The COVID-19 pandemic affected many long-term care homes across Ontario, including their ability to complete assessments and/or submit data. Available data may vary by jurisdiction and facility. Results should be interpreted in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Comments Detailed
Data are based on information from the mandatory Resident Assessment Instrument - Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS) 2.0 assessment. The RAI-MDS 2.0 is a standardized assessment that is completed for each resident upon admission to a long-term care home and quarterly thereafter, by the resident’s care team, by reviewing the resident’s medical records and speaking to the resident and their family. Legacy agency Health Quality Ontario (HQO) used an evidence-informed process and expert panel, composed of Ontario-based long-term care home operators, clinicians and researchers, to produce Ontario benchmarks that represent good resident outcomes and high-quality care. The benchmark for this indicator was set at 9% by an expert panel through a modified Delphi process (2012 & 2015). Alongside public reporting performance indicators, benchmarks are an important tool for supporting long-term care homes and sector stakeholders in tracking progress, setting priorities or targets, and learning from homes that are excelling.
 
TAGS
Sector
Long Term Care
Type
Outcome
Topic
Aging
Dimension
Safe
Source
Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS)
 
PUBLISH
Publish Datetime
06/10/2025 11:04:00